[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 --- Comment #10 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com --- I confirm that there is no ICE with the 1st testcase. The 2nd still causes ICE in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:1000. (Something strange happened with the 2nd

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hubicka Date: Tue Feb 11 22:54:21 2014 New Revision: 207702 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207702root=gccview=rev Log: PR lto/59468 * ipa-utils.h

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- The ICE is already fixed by my reorg of gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable. I am experimenting with patch that adds a warning. Honza

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 --- Comment #5 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com --- I also saw something similar with normal, non-invalid code. This TC is from Delta-reduced code.

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 31453 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31453action=edit TC: ICE in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:997

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com --- Are such strange testcases useful for you? Should I file another bug report for this new TC?

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Both strange and non-invalid testcases are welcome. A lot has changed in IPA in 4.9 and I definitely have to chase out bugs in side cases.

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug lto/59468] [4.9 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with LTO in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c:3224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59468 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com --- works with 4.8. Perhaps it should be counted as a 4.8 regression - 4.7 warns about the non-matching vtables.