https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
--- Comment #13 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
Ok. For the record, opened bug 77845.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to andysem from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> >
> > I think this testcase is violating C++ ODR. In that
> > INSTRUCTION_SET::my_simd_func_impl is the same between
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
andysem at mail dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
--- Comment #8 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
Created attachment 39751
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39751=edit
A new testcase which produces invalid code with gcc 5.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
andysem at mail dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this has been fixed already in GCC 5 (maybe even in 4.9). Can you try
GCC 5 and see if it has been fixed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
--- Comment #2 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #1)
Yes LTO doesn't support different options for different files, and combines
some of them (which happens in your case) and ignores some others.
You could
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
--- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org ---
Unfortunately, gcc does not allow using SIMD intrinsics if not enabled by
compiler switches, so leaving the compiler options for a generic target CPU
wouldn't work. At least that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61043
Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at
13 matches
Mail list logo
