[Bug lto/64343] [5 Regression] lto compile options

2014-12-18 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64343 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- Yep, I am slowly working on that: still need to finish upatin ipa passes for per-function flags (ipa-reference/ipa-icf are two remaining) and we need to figure out what to do with flags that arenot marked Optim

[Bug lto/64343] [5 Regression] lto compile options

2014-12-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64343 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Note that we should update the documentation about this change (and throw away all option handling of optimize/target attribute handled options from lto-wrapper, or rather move all of that handling to lto1).

[Bug lto/64343] [5 Regression] lto compile options

2014-12-17 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64343 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/64343] [5 Regression] lto compile options

2014-12-17 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64343 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- This is intended change. Compiling with -O0 -flto and linking with -O3 will not really give you -O3 optimized code in earlier compilers either; you will not get any of early optimizations and inlining will not

[Bug lto/64343] [5 Regression] lto compile options

2014-12-17 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64343 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,