https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Marking resolved-fixed.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #14 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Feb 16 16:22:28 2016
New Revision: 233465
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233465=gcc=rev
Log:
backport "Don't call call_cgraph_insertion_hooks in simd_clone_create"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #13 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Feb 16 13:49:22 2016
New Revision: 233450
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233450=gcc=rev
Log:
backport "Don't call call_cgraph_insertion_hooks in simd_clone_create"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #12 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Asked about 4.9/5 backport:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01054.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Feb 16 09:23:09 2016
New Revision: 233447
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233447=gcc=rev
Log:
Don't call call_cgraph_insertion_hooks in simd_clone_create
2016-02-16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
pinged: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00964.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.3, 5.3.0, 6.0
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The scenario is the following:
During pass_omp_simd_clone, we call simd_clone_create for foo, and execute the
!old_node->definition part:
...
tree old_decl = old_node->decl;
tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
a.
I'm not sure if we still should be update inline_summaries at the point that we
do pass_omp_simd_clone. AFAICT, it's the last ipa pass. Simply cloning
pass_ipa_free_inline_summary in front of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto, openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
libgomp.fortran/declare-simd-3.f90:
...
subroutine bar
use declare_simd_2_mod
real :: b(128)
integer :: i
!$omp simd
do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ICE backtrace:
...
src/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/declare-simd-3.f90: At top level:
src/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/declare-simd-3.f90:7:0: internal compiler
error: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 37609
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37609=edit
tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
16 matches
Mail list logo
