[Bug lto/69655] [6 Regression] libgomp lto failures: segfault in cgraph_node::mark_force_output

2016-02-15 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/69655] [6 Regression] libgomp lto failures: segfault in cgraph_node::mark_force_output

2016-02-15 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Mon Feb 15 09:30:31 2016 New Revision: 233419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233419=gcc=rev Log: Don't mark offload symbols with force_output in ltrans 2016-02-15 Tom

[Bug lto/69655] [6 Regression] libgomp lto failures: segfault in cgraph_node::mark_force_output

2016-02-08 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from

[Bug lto/69655] [6 Regression] libgomp lto failures: segfault in cgraph_node::mark_force_output

2016-02-03 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- In addition, these also fail (hiding PR69607, which is triggered in the same test-cases when undoing r232384): ... FAIL: libgomp.oacc-fortran/atomic_capture-1.f90 -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=1

[Bug lto/69655] [6 Regression] libgomp lto failures: segfault in cgraph_node::mark_force_output

2016-02-03 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED