https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 30 12:48:53 2017
New Revision: 254219
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254219=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-10-30 Richard Biener
PR lto/82757
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, amodra at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
>
> --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
> If you start off with "___gnu_lto_", there is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
If you start off with "___gnu_lto_", there is code in simple_object_elf.c to
handle the extra '_', and now in binutils too. Skipping just one '_' will
leave you with a symbol that matches "__gnu_lto_", and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, amodra at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
>
> --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
> > Bump st_name by one for __gnu_lto_
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
> Bump st_name by one for __gnu_lto_
Better make that two. Some targets will have an extra '_' prefix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, amodra at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
>
> --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
> Incidentally, the only reason ld.bfd gets past
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Incidentally, the only reason ld.bfd gets past the "plugin needed" warning is
that it only warns on a common symbol called __gnu_lto_slim, not an undefined
one.. Bump st_name by one for __gnu_lto_ symbols,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82757
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 regression] plugin |[8 regression] r251560
11 matches
Mail list logo