[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05107d4e4ccd11ecc8712d6e271fcb4b5f17060f commit r10-6226-g05107d4e4ccd11ecc8712d6e271fcb4b5f17060f Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: S

[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-25 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Feng Xue : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98dd8c97e44ee8134cecf681045b715a8a73c7cd commit r10-6222-g98dd8c97e44ee8134cecf681045b715a8a73c7cd Author: Feng Xue Date: Sun Jan 19 1

[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-25 Thread fxue at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 --- Comment #7 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6) > I've got state, so I'll take this as well. Here is a patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg00068.html, waiting for review from someone

[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-24 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at redhat dot com --- Commen

[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-19 Thread fxue at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 --- Comment #5 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org --- To add a specialized class for tree lattices is a way, but will complicate the code. We can simple remove the assertion. And a one-file test case was made from original files.

[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-19 Thread fxue at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 --- Comment #4 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 47676 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47676&action=edit all-in-one test case

[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-16 Thread fxue at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 --- Comment #3 from fxue at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #2) > I have analyzed this ICE and came to the conclusion that the assert is > wrong for polymorphic context lattices - e.g. in the reported case we > always p

[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-10 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor --- I have analyzed this ICE and came to the conclusion that the assert is wrong for polymorphic context lattices - e.g. in the reported case we always pass the same class to first parameter, which in the recursi

[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-09 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug lto/93166] [10 Regression] ICE in get_info_about_necessary_edges, at ipa-cp.c:4137 since r278893

2020-01-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93166 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED