[Bug lto/94237] [10 regression] Many (100s) of new LTO fails on Darwin targets

2020-03-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94237 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/94237] [10 regression] Many (100s) of new LTO fails on Darwin targets

2020-03-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94237 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfb25dfe3d34703f6e493664831dfaf53672b07b commit r10-7316-gdfb25dfe3d34703f6e493664831dfaf53672b07b Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Sat

[Bug lto/94237] [10 regression] Many (100s) of new LTO fails on Darwin targets

2020-03-20 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94237 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- One possible workaround can be not calling get_variable_section for Darwin. It will cause not so precise section information which is not critical.

[Bug lto/94237] [10 regression] Many (100s) of new LTO fails on Darwin targets

2020-03-20 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94237 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-apple-darwin* --- Comment #1 from

[Bug lto/94237] [10 regression] Many (100s) of new LTO fails on Darwin targets

2020-03-20 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94237 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-03-20 Status|UNCONFIRMED