https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #22 from Khem Raj ---
yes you are right
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #21 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Khem Raj from comment #20)
> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #18)
> > The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #20 from Khem Raj ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #18)
> The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:142d68f50b48309f48e34fc1d9d6dbbeecfde684
>
> commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
Khem Raj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raj.khem at gmail dot com
--- Comment #19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:142d68f50b48309f48e34fc1d9d6dbbeecfde684
commit r10-7492-g142d68f50b48309f48e34fc1d9d6dbbeecfde684
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by John David Anglin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc65052d2351aeb1f1968b6ac9f1244de6ed64e1
commit r8-10140-gdc65052d2351aeb1f1968b6ac9f1244de6ed64e1
Author: John David
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by John David Anglin
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:366f69fdf42854f76b90ce81394e3685f2990988
commit r9-8413-g366f69fdf42854f76b90ce81394e3685f2990988
Author: John David
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04099157691ec6ff25d8d32e30b04eec89dcf94b
commit r10-7355-g04099157691ec6ff25d8d32e30b04eec89dcf94b
Author: John David Anglin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:906b3eb9df6c577d3f6e9c3ea5c9d7e4d1e90536
commit r10-7353-g906b3eb9df6c577d3f6e9c3ea5c9d7e4d1e90536
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2020-03-23 1:37 p.m., danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I don't see a define for __BIG_ENDIAN__.
It seems we need this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin ---
On hppa-linux, we have:
#define __BIG_ENDIAN4321
/* hppa1.1 big-endian. */
#ifndef _ENDIAN_H
# error "Never use directly; include instead."
#endif
#define __BYTE_ORDER __BIG_ENDIAN
I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
I've got it, sparc64 does not define __BIG_ENDIAN__. I'm testing a patch that
does endianess detection based on __BYTE_ORDER__.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
This is with Debian ld 2.34 on hppa-linux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
[...]
> Fine, thanks. Just FYI, I built binutils master to check if the issue
> also exists with the v2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
>> Can you provide some pointers where to look? I'm totally unfamiliar
>> with this code. Maybe it's easier for you to try the Solaris/SPARC
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> Ah, ok. Can you please do some basic debugging what's hapenning?
Can you provide some pointers where to look? I'm totally unfamiliar
with this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Ah, ok. Can you please do some basic debugging what's hapenning?
Btw. is the Solaris using ELF?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
> It will be definitely caused by my g:c8429c2aba80f845939ffa6b2cfe8a0be1b50078.
[...]
> So is the reason usage of ld.gold? Is the default linker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94249
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
23 matches
Mail list logo
