https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734
--- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-05-26 3:32 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> Attached a possible fix.
While the patch fixes boot, pr100619.c fails:
spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir64/gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734
--- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-05-25 3:04 p.m., msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> In parallel, I wonder if there's something funny about
> snprintf on HP-UX. Does the snprintf call added in r12-930 do the right
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #5)
> Breakpoint 1, attr_access::from_mode_char (
> c=)
> at ../../gcc/gcc/attribs.h:304
> 304 gcc_unreachable ();
This error says that is null. c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
The plus character should always be followed by a nonempty string. John, can
you please attach a translation unit to see if by chance I can reproduce with a
cross-compiler? In parallel, I wonder if there's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> > Possibly a dup of PR100727?
>
> I think it is unrelated.
>
> The problem is the fix for PR 100619, sets the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
