[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-09-03 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-09-02 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 --- Comment #6 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The stack limit test case mostly has worked since just after this was opened (one short span where it failed again) but I don't know what fixed it. The other test case has worked fine since just

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-09-02 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- Are the ppc tests and s390 bootstrap still broken?

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-06-22 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Apparently, the same issue breaks gcc bootstrap on s390x: [ 4191s] during RTL pass: reload [ 4191s] ../../gcc/fortran/check.c: In function 'gfc_calculate_transfer_sizes': [ 4191s]

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-06-22 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, there is another similar error compiling a different test case traced to the same revision. And these are occurring on more than just power 10s. Executing on host:

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-06-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-06-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Likely dup of PR101160. No I doubt it. Both might be exposed two different latent bugs. The df_ref_record hunk looks like it is catching latent bugs really.

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-06-22 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |middle-end Keywords|