[Bug middle-end/103163] [12 Regression] stack_limit_rtx is created too early causing nregs field on REG to be zero (gcc.target/nios2/nios2-stack-check-1.c and gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/103163] [12 Regression] stack_limit_rtx is created too early causing nregs field on REG to be zero (gcc.target/nios2/nios2-stack-check-1.c and gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a0837b8fb96f50f2e60222ce289cc2542bbb477 commit r12-6693-g3a0837b8fb96f50f2e60222ce289cc2542bbb477 Author: Sandra Loosemore

[Bug middle-end/103163] [12 Regression] stack_limit_rtx is created too early causing nregs field on REG to be zero (gcc.target/nios2/nios2-stack-check-1.c and gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Not sure how it became a regression in GCC 12, but it sure looks worth > fixing. I reported how the ice became a regression in comment #1. It used to not ice

[Bug middle-end/103163] [12 Regression] stack_limit_rtx is created too early causing nregs field on REG to be zero (gcc.target/nios2/nios2-stack-check-1.c and gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener