https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Waterman ---
Ack, I misunderstood your earlier message. You're of course right that the
load/load/shift/or sequence is preferable to the load/load/store/store/load
sequence, on just about any practical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
--- Comment #5 from Lasse Collin ---
If I understood correctly, PR 50417 is about wishing that GCC would infer that
a pointer given to memcpy has alignment higher than one. In my examples the
alignment of the uint8_t *b argument is one and thus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||50417
--- Comment #4 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111502
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
