[Bug middle-end/14236] dynamically-sized arrays break alloca()

2005-02-14 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-14 16:29 --- Yes, it is natural, once you look into the mechanisms used to implement the features. However, if you focus on the definitions: - memory allocated for dynamic-sized arrays is released at the time the array

[Bug middle-end/14236] dynamically-sized arrays break alloca()

2005-02-14 Thread sds at gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From sds at gnu dot org 2005-02-14 17:47 --- (In reply to comment #9) - memory allocated with alloca() is released at the time the function that calls alloca() returns oh - I didn't know that. I always thought that alloca()ted memory is released by the next

[Bug middle-end/14236] dynamically-sized arrays break alloca()

2005-02-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10 20:53 --- *** Bug 19881 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/14236] dynamically-sized arrays break alloca()

2005-02-10 Thread sds at gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From sds at gnu dot org 2005-02-10 21:13 --- (In reply to comment #3) Well, yes, it is documented, but that doesn't make it right (although I know people that will qualify documented bugs as features :-). IMHO, it's still wrong, especially now that