[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

2004-12-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-12 21:01 --- Subject: Bug 17564 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-12 21:01:17 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog dojump.c Log message:

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

2004-12-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13 04:08 --- Subject: Bug 17564 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-13 04:08:40 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files:

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

2004-12-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-12 21:19 --- Fixed by patch. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

2004-12-05 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-12-05 22:43 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function Nathanael, Do you think we could canonicalize only when we compare a function pointer to a function pointer (rather than when comparing

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

2004-11-29 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-11-30 03:42 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function Do you think we could canonicalize only when we compare a function pointer to a function pointer (rather than when comparing a function

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

2004-11-28 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-11-28 23:16 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function Do you think we could canonicalize only when we compare a function pointer to a function pointer (rather than when comparing a function

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

2004-11-26 Thread neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:53 --- I'm going to guess that one solution is to canonicalize any function pointer any time it's cast to a void pointer. (Or do you really, really want noncanonicalized pointers, which is likely to be harder?)

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators, when casts are involved

2004-11-26 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-11-27 04:09 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 00:53 --- I'm going to guess that one solution is to

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators

2004-11-10 Thread tausq at debian dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||tausq at debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17564