--- Comment #24 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 19:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=12372)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12372action=view)
improved patch for inline warning
Works for simple testcases. Needs full bootstrap regression test.
--
--- Comment #25 from wilson at tuliptree dot org 2006-10-02 19:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] -Winline does
not respect -fno-default-inline
On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 12:36 +, lopezibanez at gmail dot com wrote:
I think I found out what is going on, although I
--- Comment #26 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-10-02 21:03 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
If you look at Comment #19, you will see that I have already provided a
solution. However, I see that I failed to add the patch I wrote to the
bug report. I will do that now. My work
--- Comment #23 from lopezibanez at gmail dot com 2006-09-30 12:36 ---
I think I found out what is going on, although I cannot decide myself what is
the correct action.
For functions declared within class scope we do: (gcc/cp/decl.c start_method()
line 11285)
DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P
--- Comment #22 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-08-05 08:16 ---
patch break -finline-functions, so it cannot be applied as is. removing patch
keyword to avoid confusion with regressions awaiting review.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #21 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:32
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
