[Bug middle-end/19329] [3.4 Regression] Bitfield operations cause shifts with 0-count to slip through backends

2005-03-14 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-14 09:36 --- Fixed then. Roger, do you believe that middle-end is right in generating these shifts by zero? If you believe it is a bug, we can open a new bugreport to track it. -- What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/19329] [3.4 Regression] Bitfield operations cause shifts with 0-count to slip through backends

2005-03-09 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-09 17:17 --- Marek, is this bug fixed then? Can we close it? -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/19329] [3.4 Regression] Bitfield operations cause shifts with 0-count to slip through backends

2005-03-09 Thread marekm at amelek dot gda dot pl
--- Additional Comments From marekm at amelek dot gda dot pl 2005-03-09 17:55 --- (In reply to comment #18) Marek, is this bug fixed then? Can we close it? Fixed for the AVR, but the middle-end may still generate these shift by 0 insns - not sure if all other targets handle

[Bug middle-end/19329] [3.4 Regression] Bitfield operations cause shifts with 0-count to slip through backends

2005-01-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27 22:36 --- Subject: Bug 19329 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-27 22:36:00 Modified files: gcc:

[Bug middle-end/19329] [3.4 Regression] Bitfield operations cause shifts with 0-count to slip through backends

2005-01-26 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-26 21:44 --- Subject: Bug 19329 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-26 21:44:26 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/avr :

[Bug middle-end/19329] [3.4 Regression] Bitfield operations cause shifts with 0-count to slip through backends

2005-01-18 Thread bernie at develer dot com
--- Additional Comments From bernie at develer dot com 2005-01-19 00:11 --- I'm no longer in charge for this bug. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|bernie at

[Bug middle-end/19329] [3.4 Regression] Bitfield operations cause shifts with 0-count to slip through backends

2005-01-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 00:12 --- (In reply to comment #8) The shift with zero comes from regmove. Well I did figure out where the shift with zero came from see above but why it comes about I don't know. --