--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-14
00:14 ---
Here's what we have at the test to see if function pointer canonicalization
should be done in dojump.c:
Breakpoint 1, do_compare_and_jump (exp=0x400ec708, signed_code=NE,
unsigned_code=NE, if_false_labe
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Additional Comments From randolph at tausq dot org 2005-06-13 16:24
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Wrong code for function pointer comparision
during optimization
> I thought this was fixed.
Nope, sorry.
randolph
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22051
--- Additional Comments From tausq at debian dot org 2005-06-13 16:23
---
this is what you get with gcc-3.3:
.LC0:
.stringz"main"
.section.rodata.cst4,"aM",@progbits,4
.align 4
.LC1:
.word P%main
[...]
ldil LR'.LC0,%r25
ldi -1,%r4
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13
16:20 ---
I thought this was fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization
