--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-17 11:47
---
*** Bug 40469 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-07 15:35 ---
Without optimization we build the following:
foo ()
{
intD.0 iD.1591;
# BLOCK 2
# PRED: ENTRY (fallthru)
[pr22456.c : 4] goto bb 4;
# SUCC: 4 (fallthru)
# BLOCK 3
# PRED: 4 (true)
[pr22456.c : 4]
--- Comment #18 from muntyan at tamu dot edu 2009-02-07 20:35 ---
There were couple of bugs with real C code where warnings are actually useful -
see comment #2, and they were closed as a dup of this one. This one may or may
not be important, but the warning did go for good, in valid
--- Comment #19 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-07 20:58 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
There were couple of bugs with real C code where warnings are actually useful
-
Yes please. reopen what those that you feel are still valid and add me to the
CC list.
--
--- Comment #20 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-07 21:33 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #18)
There were couple of bugs with real C code where warnings are actually
useful -
Yes please. reopen what those that you feel are still valid and add me to
--- Comment #16 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 19:57 ---
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
