[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2014-11-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24437 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2010-07-15 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-15 23:02 --- Wasn't this done (at least partially) by Martin? -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2010-07-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-15 23:06 --- Martin just removed the language hook. The comment in the source about fold is invalid now as we have tuples. Though it looks like there a new comment about fold_stmt_inplace. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2006-03-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 15:15 --- Subject: Bug 24437 Author: pinskia Date: Wed Mar 1 15:15:38 2006 New Revision: 111602 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=111602 Log: 2006-01-23 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2006-03-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement Target Milestone|4.2.0 |---

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2006-02-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-28 17:54 --- Reopening since the patch does not work really, see PR 26022. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2006-02-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-28 17:55 --- And unassigning since once the testing finishes on reversal I am no longer working on this (I might add another comment about the issue to tree-ssa-ccp so the next person does not forget about this issue). --

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2006-01-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 14:56 --- Subject: Bug 24437 Author: pinskia Date: Mon Jan 23 14:56:45 2006 New Revision: 110116 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=110116 Log: 2006-01-23 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2006-01-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 14:57 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2005-11-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 16:06 --- Testing the patch right now -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2005-11-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-01 03:07 --- Patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00010.html -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24437] OBJ_TYPE_REF handling in fold_stmt should be moved to fold

2005-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-23 23:44 --- I will do this for 4.2.0. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added