--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 17:41 ---
Hmm, I would almost want to go on a limb and say this was caused by the patch
for PR 21166. Can you try to revert that patch and try the mainline compiler?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24462
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 17:54
---
Hmm, I would almost want to go on a limb and say this was caused by the patch
for PR 21166. Can you try to revert that patch and try the mainline compiler?
Of course that's it. Thanks for spotting this!
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 19:51 ---
Maybe I am missing something, somewhere, what does the missing DECL_PACKED do?
Do you have a simple compile time testcase which fails with 4.1.0 but passes
with 4.0?
--
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 22:22
---
Maybe I am missing something, somewhere, what does the missing DECL_PACKED do?
Advertise that the field is bit-packed?
Do you have a simple compile time testcase which fails with 4.1.0 but passes
with 4.0?
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 06:33
---
ABI breakage: showstopper.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 10:36 ---
Confirmed.
I'm seeing on x86_64:
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 10:49
---
Confirmed.
I'm seeing on x86_64:
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o
execute
Thanks. The compat and struct-layout-1 testsuites are clean on sparc64 when
run
in
