--- Comment #18 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-06-19 15:53 ---
My PA runs show no failures of the pr24626* tests anymore. I think this
problem has been resolved and the defect can be closed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26807
--- Comment #19 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 16:35
---
Fixed by patch.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 09:01
---
Subject: Bug 26807
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Tue Jun 13 09:00:52 2006
New Revision: 114606
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114606
Log:
2006-06-13 Maxim Kuvyrkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #17 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 09:03
---
I tested this fix on a cross from i386-pc-linux-gnu and it did well on those
three tests. Can, please, someone check if the regressions gone on hppa?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26807
--- Comment #15 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-08 11:49
---
haifa_sched.c: check_cfg () ICEs because a block with the conditional jump at
the end has only 1 successor (the jump is to the next instruction). I thought
that this is invalid, but now I see that
--- Comment #13 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-07
13:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for
excess errors)
Oops, I didn't pay close enough attention. The patch may provide
some improvement. Without the change, we
--- Comment #14 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-06-07 15:24 ---
This is odd. In Monday nights run on hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11 (r114420) I only see
pr24626-2.c failing. On Tuesday nights run (r114457) I see -1, -2, -and -3
failing like in comment #13.
--
--- Comment #10 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-06-06 21:02 ---
Dave, in your last comment you said the patch didn't help but the failure you
showed was for pr24626-2, not pr24626-1 (-2 vs. -1), which is what the original
bug was about. Is pr24626-1 failing for you? It does not
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-06
21:42 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for
excess errors)
Dave, in your last comment you said the patch didn't help but the failure you
showed was for pr24626-2, not
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-06
21:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for
excess errors)
All ICEs occur at the same spot. I'd have to go back and retest
but I'm fairly certain they were all
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-05
18:35 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for
excess errors)
Will this go away with the changes to make the scheduler not extend regions by
default?
I tried the change
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:18
---
Will this go away with the changes to make the scheduler not extend regions by
default?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-04
20:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for
excess errors)
Will this go away with the changes to make the scheduler not extend regions by
default?
Can you provide the
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-04
22:40 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for
excess errors)
Will this go away with the changes to make the scheduler not extend regions
by
default?
Found it.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26807
--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 21:03 ---
The bug was introduced by r112128:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2006-03/msg00547.html
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 23:37 ---
4649 else if (any_condjump_p (head))
4650gcc_assert (EDGE_COUNT (bb-succs) 1
4651 !BARRIER_P (NEXT_INSN (head)));
(gdb) p debug_rtx
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-04 19:22 ---
Also seen on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, appearing between revisions 112080 and
112130:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-22 17:19 ---
I bet this was caused by the IA64 scheduler improvements on 2006-03-16.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26807
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-22
18:49 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for
excess errors)
I bet this was caused by the IA64 scheduler improvements on 2006-03-16.
That's probably a good candidate.
21 matches
Mail list logo
