[Bug middle-end/26869] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands.

2006-04-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 08:21 --- Subject: Bug 26869 Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 24 08:21:41 2006 New Revision: 113219 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113219 Log: 2006-04-24 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/26869] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands.

2006-04-19 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-19 08:00 --- Subject: Bug number PR26869 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00690.html --

[Bug middle-end/26869] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands.

2006-04-18 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-18 13:55 --- richi: if bD.1520 does not have a default def because it is unused, your fix makes sense. Can you confirm that it is b and not c that does not have a default def, i.e. that c does have a default def? --

[Bug middle-end/26869] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands.

2006-04-18 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2006-04-18 14:07 --- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands. On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, bonzini at gnu dot org wrote: richi: if bD.1520 does not have a default def because it is unused, your fix

[Bug middle-end/26869] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands.

2006-04-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-18 14:46 --- I'll bootstrap test the obvious patch then. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/26869] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands.

2006-04-18 Thread paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2006-04-18 14:47 --- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands. rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-18 14:46

[Bug middle-end/26869] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands.

2006-04-18 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2006-04-18 15:03 --- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands. On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch wrote: I'll bootstrap test the obvious patch then. It's

[Bug middle-end/26869] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands.

2006-04-16 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26869

[Bug middle-end/26869] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands.

2006-04-07 Thread uros at kss-loka dot si
--- Comment #3 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-04-07 06:10 --- *** Bug 27069 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- uros at kss-loka dot si changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/26869] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Segfault in find_lattice_value() for complex operands.

2006-03-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu dot org, |