--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 07:24
---
Subject: Bug 27536
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 13 07:23:59 2006
New Revision: 114601
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114601
Log:
2006-06-13 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 07:24
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27536
--- Comment #13 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-04 19:20 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27536
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00183.html
--
--- Comment #12 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-01 14:20 ---
*** Bug 27862 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 17:34 ---
What is happening with this patch? Are these test results considered good?
Will this patch be submitted?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27536
--- Comment #10 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-05-16 20:56 ---
Testresults here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-05/msg00858.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27536
--- Comment #8 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 15:30 ---
Andreas or AJ,:
Can you test with gcc/except.c:output_ttype() changed from expand_normal() to
expand_expr (..., EXPAND_INITIALIZER, ...) ?
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #9 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-05-15 21:57 ---
That fixes the Ada build, but I haven't run a full regtest yet.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27536
--- Comment #3 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-05-11 09:03 ---
(gdb) bt
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x10849bb8 ../../gcc/emit-rtl.c, line=1784,
function=0x10849954 change_address_1) at ../../gcc/diagnostic.c:642
#1 0x103d975c in change_address_1 (memref=0xf7976af0, mode=BLKmode,
--- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 15:13 ---
It looks like something in exception handling is creating a new object very
late, after reload, and the new address is not validized before being handed to
replace_equiv_address().
Should
--- Comment #5 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-05-11 15:56
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] -fsection-anchors breaks Ada
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It looks like something in exception handling is creating a new object
very late, after reload,
--- Comment #6 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-05-11 16:08 ---
addr_expr 0xf7f78680
type pointer_type 0xf7ede888 gnat__os_lib__copy_file__A25b
type record_type 0xf7ed9bc8 exception sizes-gimplified asm_written BLK
size integer_cst 0xf7ed7b80 constant invariant
--- Comment #7 from richard at codesourcery dot com 2006-05-11 16:18
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] -fsection-anchors breaks Ada
Thanks Andreas. I might be barking up the wrong tree here, but it seems
odd to me is that output_ttype is using expand_normal () to expand this
tree.
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-11 05:39
---
I can disable section anchors for Ada, similar to Objective C and Objective
C++, but this failure likely means that there is a bug in the Trees generated
by GNU Ada.
It's only a wild guess until someone first
15 matches
Mail list logo
