[Bug middle-end/32791] missed optimization after inline functions with multiple return statements

2011-07-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32791 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/32791] missed optimization after inline functions with multiple return statements

2007-07-19 Thread manuelle at ee dot ethz dot ch
--- Comment #2 from manuelle at ee dot ethz dot ch 2007-07-19 17:51 --- Created an attachment (id=13940) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13940action=view) test cases -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32791

[Bug middle-end/32791] missed optimization after inline functions with multiple return statements

2007-07-19 Thread manuelle at ee dot ethz dot ch
--- Comment #3 from manuelle at ee dot ethz dot ch 2007-07-19 17:52 --- hmm, I'm not sure if that is the same problem. your testcase from bug 32810 does the right thing on x86. in the attached file containing all three functions func1 and func3 produce the same code, only code produced

[Bug middle-end/32791] missed optimization after inline functions with multiple return statements

2007-07-19 Thread pinskia at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-19 17:56 --- Subject: Re: missed optimization after inline functions with multiple return statements On 19 Jul 2007 17:52:14 -, manuelle at ee dot ethz dot ch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: your testcase from bug 32810 does the right

[Bug middle-end/32791] missed optimization after inline functions with multiple return statements

2007-07-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-18 15:37 --- Confirmed. I will file a seperate bug for a missed optimization at the tree level. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added