--- Comment #20 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-06-17 15:41 ---
I forgot to put the defect number in the ChangeLog entry but this is fixed with
r148614, a patch to expr.c.
--
sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-06-12 23:17 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg01023.html for a possible
patch and for a question about two different approaches.
--
sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-08 17:50
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I am not sure myself, I believe that there are not so many cases in
> which this would prove beneficial. When there are no operations
> performed on the scalars, the only situ
--- Comment #17 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-08 17:49
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Wait, (In reply to comment #15)
> > (In reply to comment #11)
> > > It is caused by revision 147980:
> > >
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00959.html
> > >
> >
> > Revi
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-07 15:55
---
Wait, (In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > It is caused by revision 147980:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00959.html
> >
>
> Revision 147978 also does not work if you comp
--- Comment #15 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-07 14:41
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> It is caused by revision 147980:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00959.html
>
Revision 147978 also does not work if you compile the testcase with
the -fno-tree-sra switch
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-07 13:40 ---
Subject: Bug 32950
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Jun 7 13:39:54 2009
New Revision: 148246
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148246
Log:
2009-06-07 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-07 13:38 ---
Subject: Bug 32950
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Jun 7 13:38:38 2009
New Revision: 148245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148245
Log:
2009-06-07 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-07 13:35 ---
Subject: Bug 32950
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Jun 7 13:35:05 2009
New Revision: 148244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148244
Log:
2009-06-07 H.J. Lu
PR middle-end/32950
* g++.dg/
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-06-07 13:26
---
It is caused by revision 147980:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00959.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-06 22:22
---
Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] ICE with __complex__
double
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> That is why we shouldn't close a bug report without checking
> in a testcase.
Closing a bra
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-06-06 22:16 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The bug reappeared between 2009-05-22 and 2009-05-29 on the trunk.
>
That is why we shouldn't close a bug report without checking
in a testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Comment #8 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-06 20:32
---
The bug reappeared between 2009-05-22 and 2009-05-29 on the trunk.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
