https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33086
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 14:47 ---
Andrew, what about functions marked with attribute pure ?
int atoi(const char *) __attribute__ ((pure));
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33086
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 10:15 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
void use(const int *a)
{
int *b = (int*)a;
Andrew, you are right. I tend to forget how fragile is 'const', even in C++.
So, then this is invalid and thus it is PR10138.
--
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-16 10:59 ---
At least for languages where 'const' is actually enforced
There is none, unless you are taking about fortran in arguments. So we need
to mark such argument as special.
Now if you have the full program (or at
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-16 11:19 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
At least for languages where 'const' is actually enforced
There is none,
void use(const int *a)
{
a[0] = 5;
}
void foo(void)
{
int i;
use(i);
}
new.c:3: error: assignment of
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-16 14:58 ---
void use(const int *a)
{
int *b = (int*)a;
b[0] = 5;
}
void foo(void)
{
int i;
use(i);
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33086
