--- Comment #8 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-19 18:08
---
Fixed
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2007-09-17
14:52 ---
On powerpc-apple-darwin9, the patch Zdenek is checking in...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01380.html
suppresses the build problems in Java...
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2007-09-17
14:57 ---
To clarify, what I meant to say in the above comment was that I am concerned if
Zdenek's patch may convert this PR into a latent bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33348
--- Comment #7 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-17 15:12 ---
Subject: Bug 33348
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Sep 17 15:12:10 2007
New Revision: 128547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=128547
Log:
PR middle-end/33348
PR target/33406
*
--- Comment #3 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 21:52 ---
What happens in this testcase is (mis)behaviour of invariant code motion.
On instruction:
(set (mem/c/i:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 113 sfp)
(const_int 80 [0x50])) [3 S4 A32])
(fix:SI (reg:DF 135)))
the
--- Comment #4 from rakdver at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2007-09-16
22:07 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/19990826-3.f fails at -O1
What happens in this testcase is (mis)behaviour of invariant code motion.
On instruction:
(set (mem/c/i:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 113
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-15 19:47 ---
I have reduced the test to:
C* PCAPOP
SUBROUTINE PCAPOP()
DIMENSION NVA(6)
C
! P1=FLOAT(NB)/FLOAT(M1)
10IP1=P1
IF(IP1.GE.NVA(K)) GOTO 7
IF(IP2.EQ.0) GOTO 3
7 IF(K.EQ.6) GOTO 11
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-15 20:28 ---
The line
SUBROUTINE PCAPOP()
is not necessary to get the failure.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33348
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33348
