[Bug middle-end/33699] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression], missing optimization on const addr area store

2010-03-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-12 23:56 --- PowerPC has the same issue. X86 does not because it's move instruction can take a constant address. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/33699] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression], missing optimization on const addr area store

2009-08-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:28 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/33699] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression], missing optimization on const addr area store

2009-05-28 Thread nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-28 07:43 --- Subject: Bug 33699 Author: nemet Date: Thu May 28 07:42:52 2009 New Revision: 147944 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147944 Log: PR middle-end/33699 * target.h (struct

[Bug middle-end/33699] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression], missing optimization on const addr area store

2009-05-28 Thread nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-28 07:49 --- Note that the above patch does not yet fix the testcase. Besides this patch we need some more cost adjustments and also some changes in fwprop to propagate into the address expression. --

[Bug middle-end/33699] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression], missing optimization on const addr area store

2009-03-31 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 20:12 --- Closing 4.2 branch. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added