--- Comment #4 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-03-20 11:08 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
No feedback in over a year. Presumed fixed in 4.3.0.
I can confirm that this test case works when compiled with a vanilla gcc-4.3.3
built for armv5tel eabi.
--
--- Comment #3 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-18 11:49
---
No feedback in over a year. Presumed fixed in 4.3.0.
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from ramana dot r at gmail dot com 2009-03-17 14:40 ---
This appears to be fixed on mainline on gcc version 4.4.0 20090317
(experimental) (GCC).
output obtained
42 69 105
42 69 105
--
ramana dot r at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34109
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 18:53 ---
I think this is already fixed in 4.3.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
