[Bug middle-end/37060] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bogus __builtin___memcpy_chk overflow warning

2009-02-03 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-03 17:15 --- Only fails on 64-bit targets. -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/37060] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bogus __builtin___memcpy_chk overflow warning

2009-02-03 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-03 17:21 --- Interesting: we actually propagate *more* on 64-bit targets, and end up with __builtin___memcpy_chk (buf, valbuf_7(D), 16, 8); while on 32-bit we get __builtin___memcpy_chk (buf, valbuf_7(D), D.1293_2, 8); --

[Bug middle-end/37060] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bogus __builtin___memcpy_chk overflow warning

2009-01-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:20 --- GCC 4.3.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37060] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bogus __builtin___memcpy_chk overflow warning

2008-12-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-27 14:41 --- I don't get the warning on the trunk or the 4.3 branch on i386-darwin8.11. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37060

[Bug middle-end/37060] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bogus __builtin___memcpy_chk overflow warning

2008-08-27 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:05 --- 4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37060] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bogus __builtin___memcpy_chk overflow warning

2008-08-08 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-08-08 15:16 --- Created an attachment (id=16047) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16047action=view) Testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37060

[Bug middle-end/37060] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bogus __builtin___memcpy_chk overflow warning

2008-08-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-08 15:43 --- We fail to see that the len == 16 case cannot happen in the second if (), more specifically we fail to jump-thread because of the twisted CFG. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What