[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-16 08:20 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-16 08:21 --- Subject: Bug 37418 Author: rguenth Date: Thu Oct 16 08:19:49 2008 New Revision: 141165 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141165 Log: 2008-10-16 Joseph Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard

[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-10-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-08 15:59 --- Looks like I taked over ... -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-09-13 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-13 18:59 --- Working on a patch. It's not a MODIFY_EXPR but an ADDR_EXPR with problematic conversion. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-09-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-13 19:59 --- *** Bug 37510 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-09-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 06:45 --- This is IMHO a C FE bug (works with C++ just fine and the MODIFY_EXPR with non-useless type conversion between LHS and RHS type is created by the C FE). -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-09-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 19:43 --- *** Bug 37467 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-09-09 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37418

[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-09-08 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-09-08 08:53 --- Created an attachment (id=16252) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16252action=view) Preprocessed code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37418

[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-09-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-08 20:38 --- Reducing ... -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37418] [4.4 Regression] error: type mismatch in address expression, verify_gimple failed

2008-09-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-08 20:44 --- Reduced testcase: typedef void failure_callback_t(int); void default_panic_handler(int args)__attribute__((noreturn)); void i_set_panic_handler(failure_callback_t *callback __attribute__((noreturn))) { callback =