--- Comment #14 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 16:25 ---
Subject: Bug 37485
Author: spop
Date: Wed Oct 15 16:24:15 2008
New Revision: 141143
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=141143
Log:
2008-10-15 Jan Sjodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harsha
--- Comment #15 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 16:27 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-11 19:26 ---
Subject: Re: [graphite] Disconnecting exit edge in process of code generation
Are there any overlapping scops with the current code?
I haven't seen overlapping scops anymore. Thanks.
--
--- Comment #12 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-10 19:40
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Subject: Re: [graphite] Disconnecting exit edge in process of code generation
Commit 140746 should have fixed Bug 3. Can you confirm this?
This is a side effect of your patch.
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-03 20:28 ---
*** Bug 37587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-02 22:50 ---
Subject: Bug 37485
Author: spop
Date: Thu Oct 2 22:48:46 2008
New Revision: 140844
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140844
Log:
2008-10-02 Jan Sjodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harsha
--- Comment #8 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 13:21 ---
Commit 140746 should have fixed Bug 3. Can you confirm this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37485
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-29 14:50 ---
Subject: Re: [graphite] Disconnecting exit edge in process of code generation
Commit 140746 should have fixed Bug 3. Can you confirm this?
This is a side effect of your patch. This bug is not yet fixed, and
the
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-13 12:43 ---
Fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37485
--- Comment #2 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-12 12:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=16302)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16302action=view)
Just a simple loop over an array
I can confirm this one using this simple test case.
--
--
hjagasia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |hjagasia at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from hjagasia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-12 15:44
---
Jan and I have a bug fix for this, which will be posted in some time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37485
--- Comment #4 from hjagasia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-12 16:52
---
The reduced test case block-2.c triggers 3 seperate bugs.
First:
In tranlate_clast when clast stmt is a stmt_user, we can end up disconnecting
the edge that is the exit_edge of the scop that is transformed. This
--- Comment #5 from hjagasia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-12 16:54
---
Created an attachment (id=16304)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16304action=view)
This patch fixes all three problems in the reduced test case block-2.c
--
--- Comment #6 from hjagasia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-12 16:59
---
2008-09-05 Jan Sjodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harsha Jagasia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* graphite.c (gmp_cst_to_tree): Moved.
(iv_stack_entry_is_constant): New.
(iv_stack_entry_is_iv):
--- Comment #1 from harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com 2008-09-11 20:05
---
Created an attachment (id=16298)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16298action=view)
Reduced test case for bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37485
16 matches
Mail list logo
