https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I actually just ran into a problem caused by having this check here.
I was modifying tree-ssa-ifcombine to optimize the case where we have the same
condition on both bb from a bb like:
```
int g();
int h();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-02-02 00:00:00 |2023-5-26
--- Comment #5 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Confirmed.
> The code looks slightly different now as find_edge has been inlined and
> merged with checking for eh edges.
Which was done with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-25 19:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=16767)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16767action=view)
patch
Patch that miscompares.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264
--- Comment #2 from law at redhat dot com 2008-11-25 20:04 ---
Subject: Re: New: tree_forwarder_block_p says no to
first basic block
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
tree_forwarder_block_p has
if (find_edge (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR, bb))
return false;
without explanation.
