--- Comment #1 from jdassen at debian dot org 2009-01-29 09:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=17206)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17206action=view)
The (gtk-doc-tools generated) gsf-scan.c file which gets miscompiled
--
--- Comment #2 from jdassen at debian dot org 2009-01-29 09:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=17207)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17207action=view)
The (gtk-doc-tools generated) gsf-scan.c file which gets miscompiled,
preprocessed.
--
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-29 10:01 ---
The best option would be to revert that patch on the branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-29 10:14 ---
when Ray wrote he tested with a snapshot build, I assume this was 20090107
without the patch applied, so the status on the trunk is not known yet. will
test with current trunk later.
--
--- Comment #5 from jdassen at debian dot org 2009-01-29 10:24 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
when Ray wrote he tested with a snapshot build, I assume this was 20090107
without the patch applied,
Yes, I was using sid's gcc-snapshot 20090107-1.
--
--- Comment #6 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-01-29 17:00 ---
What GCC options was gsf-scan.i compiled with? I am trying to see what
variables are getting/not getting promoted during the compilation and I am not
seeing it affect any variables if I just compile gsf-scan.i with
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:01 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-29
10:01 ---
The best option would be to revert that patch on the branch.
Except it alone could not
--- Comment #7 from jdassen at debian dot org 2009-01-29 17:53 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The best option would be to revert that patch on the branch.
Matthias did that in the 4.3.3-3 packages and with them, the problem has
indeed gone away.
(In reply to comment #6)
What GCC
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-01-29 17:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] wrong code building libgsf
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:01 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc
--- Comment #9 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2009-01-29 18:57 ---
So far I have been unable to reproduce this problem. When compiling gsf-scan.i
I do not even reach the code that I changed in PR 38615 and I get the same code
with or without my change included.
Assuming there is a way
10 matches
Mail list logo
