[Bug middle-end/44839] [4.6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/uninit-17.c

2010-07-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 12:11 --- Failure is gone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/44839] [4.6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/uninit-17.c

2010-07-06 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-07-06 14:13 --- Don't we have middle-end/44738 for this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44839

[Bug middle-end/44839] [4.6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/uninit-17.c

2010-07-06 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-07-06 14:28 --- (In reply to comment #1) Don't we have middle-end/44738 for this? They didn't fail for me on 32bit hosts before. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44839

[Bug middle-end/44839] [4.6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/uninit-17.c

2010-07-06 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-07-06 15:06 --- Bah, I would commonize these two bugs anyway, really that testcase is badly broken essentially everywhere. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44839

[Bug middle-end/44839] [4.6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/uninit-17.c

2010-07-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44839