http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, |alpha-dec-osf5.1b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-08
01:26:47 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Wed Dec 8 01:26:44 2010
New Revision: 167581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167581
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-06 17:27:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
sdbout.c is broken then.
Quite likely, but I don't understand what it thinks it's trying to do yet
well enough to be sure how.
If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-12-03 15:21:51 UTC ---
Jan, your patch has broken bootstrap on two platforms for a week now,
and there's not even an indication that you're looking at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-12-03 17:22:07 UTC ---
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-02
03:19:59 UTC ---
default_function_section is being called on systems without named sections.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-27
02:07:08 UTC ---
Backtrace:
Breakpoint 1, default_no_named_section (name=0x7afad8f0 .text.startup,
flags=2097408, decl=0x7afa6900) at ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c:5994
5994
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-27
04:20:08 UTC ---
I'm going to try removing assert.
It should be noted that on 32-bit HP-UX we create multiple unamed sections
(subspaces) in an object.
Doesn't
16 matches
Mail list logo