http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #12 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-19 11:14:23
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Sun Dec 19 11:14:19 2010
New Revision: 168047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168047
Log:
PR middle-end/46674
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #11 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-15 16:17:54
UTC ---
Created attachment 22765
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22765
Lower all C identifiers to actual assembler symbols for comparison.
This should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #10 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-10 14:29:03
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Fri Dec 10 14:28:58 2010
New Revision: 167688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167688
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #7 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-02 04:10:04 UTC
---
Author: jiez
Date: Thu Dec 2 04:09:58 2010
New Revision: 167365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167365
Log:
PR middle-end/46674
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #4 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-30 10:00:05 UTC
---
Hah, I now know the root cause. It's *__GI_memchr that is added into the
visible point set since it's a user provided name. But GCC looks for
__GI_memchr later,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #5 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-30 11:17:47 UTC
---
Created attachment 22577
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22577
The patch
I'm testing this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #6 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-30 23:58:54 UTC
---
The patch for review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg02973.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #3 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-29 10:56:37 UTC
---
If I revert this change, this bug will disappear.
@@ -416,7 +415,7 @@ cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes (bool be
found = true;
/* If so, we need
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
15 matches
Mail list logo
