http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-02
08:40:08 UTC ---
I'd actually prefer to go with the sparc.c change (probably including
flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition), then hppa could just write its own
function_section
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-02
11:30:54 UTC ---
Alternatively, we could do something like:
--- gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c.jj2010-11-26 18:39:04.0 +0100
+++ gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-30 21:52:57 UTC ---
On the other side, the above is still broken with
-freorder-blocks-and-partition and I guess even before Honza's change it has
been broken.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-30 22:22:22 UTC ---
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, John David Anglin wrote:
On the other side, the above is still broken with
-freorder-blocks-and-partition and I guess even before Honza's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-29
11:58:56 UTC ---
What is the assembly difference on SPARC Linux? The only difference I see
with
a cross compiler to sparc64-linux, both for -O1 -m32 -mptr32 and -O1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-29
15:17:30 UTC ---
I guess we could do something like:
--- varasm.c.jj2010-11-29 12:39:07.0 +0100
+++ varasm.c2010-11-29 15:15:53.0 +0100
@@ -534,6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |---
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-27
16:33:36 UTC ---
Although the printouts don't show it, the fails are with -fpic.
The non pic versions don't fail.
In the nested-6.c case, it appears the procedure label
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-27
16:53:41 UTC ---
ldo -62(%r30),%r23
bl qsort,%r2
The offset of -62 is misaligned. r23 should point to a plabel.
plabels have to be 4-byte aligned.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
13 matches
Mail list logo
