https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
Roland Schulz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roland at rschulz dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 25 May 2014, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #23 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch ---
Which Syntax?
I want to reuse the same code for the various architecture and let gcc deal
with vectorization details.
The best I manage to do to share code is something
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 26 May 2014, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #23 from vincenzo Innocente
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #17 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-10 10:16:13 UTC ---
I tested this
float x[1024], y[1024], z[1024], w[1024];
void foo() {
for (int i=0; i!=1024; ++i)
x[i]=y[i]*z[i]+w[i];
}
void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #18 from Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com 2012-05-10
16:48:45 UTC ---
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:16 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #19 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-10 16:51:33 UTC ---
On 10 May, 2012, at 6:48 PM, tmsriram at google dot com wrote:
As you notice the source code is identical as I'm exploiting compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #20 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2012-05-10 20:45:58
UTC ---
Auto Cloning is an independent feature. What is requested here is an extension
of a previous auto clone patch by Sri (which is based on command line option
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #16 from Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com 2012-05-09
19:03:01 UTC ---
Bug fixed, patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00694.html
Thanks for trying,
-Sri.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:18 AM,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #14 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-08 09:18:01 UTC ---
added your patch on top of
c++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #15 from Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com 2012-05-08
17:09:43 UTC ---
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:18 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-07 13:05:18 UTC ---
Please post on this PR when a version of 4.8 exists that supports the feature
(I saw several patches proposed and even committed)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #12 from Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com 2012-05-07
16:54:57 UTC ---
Will do, thanks.
-Sri.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:05 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #13 from Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com 2012-05-07
17:04:05 UTC ---
Here is the patch to do function multiversioning which is under review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00078.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-10-28 09:06:30 UTC ---
sorry to ping again.
Stage 1 is supposed to end Nov 7th.
Will the new feature work out by Sri make for 4.7?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-10-28 09:14:29 UTC ---
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #7 from vincenzo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-10-28 14:00:18 UTC ---
That's a pity.
It would be very useful though to have at least a patch to test so that we can
have something to use in prototypes and eventually
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #10 from Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com 2011-10-28
17:28:23 UTC ---
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:00 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-07-23 13:29:36 UTC ---
Any news on this item?
Is this feature still foreseen for 4.7?
A patch to test for instance.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #6 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2011-07-23 17:28:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Any news on this item?
Is this feature still foreseen for 4.7?
A patch to test for instance.
Sri is working on this. He will post a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-06-11 05:58:46 UTC ---
These new developments sound interesting. Hope somebody is working on it and
will publish a testable version soon.
On the other hand I was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tmsriram at google
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2011-06-11 07:06:24 UTC ---
Thanks for the clarification, waiting for some patch/branch to test.
please keep me posted (or let me know with PR I shall watch).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
26 matches
Mail list logo
