http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50950
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-02
09:48:16 UTC ---
No, it's the lame warning-for-uninitialized-memory (your variables are
address-taken) code that triggered in 4.4 but not in newer releases.
Thus it's more
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50950
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50950
--- Comment #3 from Ozkan Sezer sezeroz at gmail dot com 2011-11-02 11:29:20
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
A dup actually (fixed on trunk):
Thank you. Can we expect a backport of the fix to 4.5 and 4.6?
t.c: In function 'f0':
t.c:14:5:
