http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #7 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-29 02:15:37 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Thu Mar 29 02:15:29 2012
New Revision: 185944
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185944
Log:
2012-03-28 Joey Ye joey...@arm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #5 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-26 08:43:51 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Mon Dec 26 08:43:48 2011
New Revision: 182685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182685
Log:
2011-12-26 Joey Ye joey...@arm.com
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #6 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-27 02:27:01 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Tue Dec 27 02:26:57 2011
New Revision: 182691
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182691
Log:
2011-12-26 Joey Ye joey...@arm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #2 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com 2011-11-22 03:58:29 UTC ---
Here is a test case fix.
With this patch, backend part of Bernd's original patch can be skipped. Thus
DJ's concern of unnecessary change can be addressed.
Also this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #1 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com 2011-11-18 02:23:17 UTC ---
A patch is available at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00217.html
but is pending for about 1 year.
Latest discussion is at
