http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #11 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-24
13:46:42 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Sat Mar 24 13:46:33 2012
New Revision: 185757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185757
Log:
gcc/
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-24
13:47:51 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Sat Mar 24 13:47:46 2012
New Revision: 185758
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185758
Log:
gcc/
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #13 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-24
13:48:51 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Sat Mar 24 13:48:35 2012
New Revision: 185759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185759
Log:
gcc/
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #10 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-03-21
19:46:31 UTC ---
Works. ~13 sec for 243k entries. Still slower than GCC 3.4 but at least better
than 80+ seconds.
