http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-14 09:03:20
UTC ---
20% runtime regression in rnflow [1] happened in this timeframe, perhaps it
could be attributed to the patch, mentioned in Comment #2.
[1]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-05-14
09:21:41 UTC ---
20% runtime regression in rnflow [1] happened in this timeframe, perhaps it
could be attributed to the patch, mentioned in Comment #2.
This slowdown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-14
09:32:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
20% runtime regression in rnflow [1] happened in this timeframe, perhaps it
could be attributed to the patch, mentioned in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-05-14
09:39:20 UTC ---
That patch was supposed to be a no-op on code generation.
I have opened pr53340.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-13 19:26:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Following testcase:
--cut here--
#define SIZE 10240
int b[SIZE], c[SIZE];
long long __attribute__((__aligned__ (128))) a[SIZE];
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53338
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
