https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Bug 5 depends on bug 57511, which changed state.
Bug 57511 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Missing SCEV final value replacement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
What|Removed |Added
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener 2012-12-18
13:12:39 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 18 13:12:34 2012
New Revision: 194578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194578
Log:
2012-12-18 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener 2012-12-17
12:14:18 UTC ---
Ok, I'm confused by the following:
: (loop 1 header)
# lxp_1 = PHI <0(2), lxp_24(12)>
t_9 = pol_x[lxp_1];
_10 = (long int) lxp_1;
_11 = _10 * 4;
l_12 = _11 +
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener 2012-12-14
14:11:59 UTC ---
The unrolling puts __builtin_unreachable ()s into the inner duplicated loops:
First iteration, good:
:
# lxp_30 = PHI <0(2)>
t_32 = pol_x[lxp_30];
_33 = (long in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener 2012-12-14
13:49:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I've tried to rewrite this as C, but managed to turn it into something that is
> miscompiled at a different spot. The fortran testcase starts having
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|[4.8 Regre
