http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #6 from Brad Huntting 2013-01-23
23:59:39 UTC ---
Er... The asm()s are beside the point. There is no reording bug. The
problem is that the 3 volatile assignments are being squished into 1. BTW:
I first noticed this with th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-22
23:15:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Did you check? It looks like I can reproduce the issue with trunk from last
> week, whereas you fixed PR54494 months ago. Note that here the stores ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-22 23:13:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I thought I fixed this already via PR54494
Did you check? It looks like I can reproduce the issue with trunk from last
week, whereas you fixed PR5449
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-22
22:51:33 UTC ---
I think you need to report this bug to Ubuntu/Linaro as I said I had fixed this
via bug 54494
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from
