http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05
15:16:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 5 15:16:49 2013
New Revision: 196466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196466
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526
--- Comment #4 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2013-03-06 02:06:03 UTC
---
It does fix that warning, but there's a bug in the analysis that makes it a
false positive. I've had difficulty reducing it to a self-contained example,
and I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-06
07:03:23 UTC ---
Maybe-uninitialized warnings have tons of known false positives, while the
predicated analysis can handle the simplest cases, it can't handle anything
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2013-03-04 19:04:58 UTC
---
Created attachment 29580
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29580
save-temps output from same commandline/path
