http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #14)
The patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-05/msg01050.html
is wrong
I realized this myself about 6 hours ago, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30228
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30228action=edit
Yet another patch that doesn't work
This one fails with
program main
^
_24 = i_1 1;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu May 30 21:32:53 2013
New Revision: 199461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199461root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-05-30 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30142
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30142action=edit
Another patch that doesn't work...
This time with the right PR...
I tried to follow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-03
09:58:20 UTC ---
After some discussion with Jakub and Richard - and after doing some code reads,
I think it is best do handle this in tree-ssa-math-opts.c (search for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29968|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
21:08:36 UTC ---
The problem is the following in gimplify.c:
In gimplify_cond_expr, one has:
/* If this COND_EXPR has a value, copy the values into a temporary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
22:00:53 UTC ---
For completeness, gimplify_ctxp-into_ssa is 0 for the -O0 optimization and it
gets set to 1 in gimple_regimplify_operands. Thus, it is not surprising
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-29
08:40:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
patch that fails
The Fortran patch of the attachments looks fine, except for:
+ one = gfc_copy_expr (op1);
+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-28
09:05:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Modulo is an integer only operation, so I'd say you want
(k 1) ? -1.0 : 1.0
instead, converting (k 1) into floating
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-28
22:03:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 29968
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29968
patch that fails
The patch in the attachment fails with the test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
16 matches
Mail list logo
