http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Jan 8 05:56:31 2014
New Revision: 206417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206417root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59285
* ifcvt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
Yufeng Zhang yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yufeng at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
I have multiple fixes. Steven and I disagree on which is better.
Having Richi or Jakub chime in with their opinions would help -- if they agree
with Steven, then I'll go with the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #3)
Working on this again. I'm on the 4th iteration of the fix. Bootstrapping
on ARM boxes is painfully slow :(
I could bootstrap a patch on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Working on this again. I'm on the 4th iteration of the fix. Bootstrapping on
ARM boxes is painfully slow :(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
How fast is your box? I'm using 4 processors on a calxeda system... It's
painful, particularly when the first calxeda box's disk died, thus losing my
build trees test results.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
How fast is your box? I'm using 4 processors on a calxeda system... It's
painful, particularly when the first calxeda box's disk died, thus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
After sleeping on it, I think a different approach to the fix is going to be
better. This is a latent bug in the RTL conditional execution/block merging
code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Patch in testing.
14 matches
Mail list logo