[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 8 08:59:29 2014 New Revision: 206420 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206420root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-01-08 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 8 22:33:12 2014 New Revision: 206448 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206448root=gccview=rev Log: PR middle-end/59471 * gcc.dg/pr59471.c

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Testing Index: gimplify.c === ---

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- The reason I added this verification is that code does not expect those to appear at non-outermost handled-component. a V_C_E around a vector type B_F_R should have been split into

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think BIT_FIELD_REF's type can't be a vector, so it has to be integral type in this case.

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) I think BIT_FIELD_REF's type can't be a vector, Er, I am quite sure a BIT_FIELD_REF can be a vector. Maybe that wasn't a general statement

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- You mean BIT_FIELD_REF argument can be a vector? Sure. But the type of the BIT_FIELD_REF itself?

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) You mean BIT_FIELD_REF argument can be a vector? Sure. But the type of the BIT_FIELD_REF itself? Yes, the type of the BIT_FIELD_REF

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- It should be easy to make SRA safely cope with BIT_FIELD_REFs, REALPART_EXPRs and IMAGPART_EXPRs under a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR (as opposed to those under a COMPONENT_REF, ARRAY_REF,

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last